VA Finalizes Sweeping VA Rules Change

On September 25, 2014, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published final rules of sweeping importance.  The rules have two major components:

  1. To require all claims to be filed on standard forms prescribed by the Secretary, regardless of the type of claim or posture in which the claim arises, and
  2. to provide that VA would accept an expression of dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative determination by the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) as a Notice of Disagreement (NOD) only if it is submitted on a standardized form provided by VA for the purpose of appealing the decision, in cases where such a form is provided.

The first component – requiring all claims to be filed on a standard form – eliminates informal claims based on VA medical exams.  Thus, with this rule, VA has wiped out an entire body of case law.

This is a summary of VA’s new system:

38 C.F.R. § 20.201, Notice of Disagreement

VA’s new rule states that VA will not accept as a notice of disagreement an expression of dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative determination submitted in any other format than the form provided by the VA, meaning form 21-0958.  The requirements of what form 21-0958 must contain remain somewhat undefined.  Current case law will provide some guidance on this issue.

38 C.F.R. § 3.155, Claims

This rule creates two categories: a completed claim and an incomplete claim, which is described as an “intent to file a claim.”  VA will not accept an expression of an intention for benefits that is not in the newly prescribed formats – like through an electronic VA portal.  But, VA will accept the expression of an intent as a placeholder for the effective date.  VA will also send to the veteran notice of the incomplete nature of the veteran’s submission along with a form the veteran may use to perfect the intent and establish a recognized claim.  The veteran will have one year to perfect the expression of intent for benefits – to convert the “incomplete claim” into a “claim” – to preserve the effective date created by the placeholder.  This rule is the one that goes farthest to eliminate informal claims.

38 C.F.R. § 3.160, Types of Claims and Abolishing the Informal Claim, Current Rule 38 C.F.R. § 3.155

Proposed Rule 3.160, in conjunction with the new Rule 3.155 — completes the evisceration of CAVC cases that requires VA to adjudicate claims reasonably raised by the evidence.  Under this rule, VA will not optimize veterans’ benefits because it will limit the analysis to the four corners of a “completed claim,” which this Rule defines.  The informal inferred claim will cease to exist and render meaningless a large body of case law.  The rules also purport to treat an application for total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU) as a claim.  This appears to conflict with the current, although admittedly complex, understanding of what a request for TDIU is.

This change places veterans at a disadvantage and corrodes the uniquely friendly system which Congress intended to create.  It also risks creating a system wherein technical pleading is required.  This is especially likely for veterans who describe symptoms rather than diagnoses on a claim form.  For example, if a veteran requests compensation for “Agent Orange related disabilities,” then VA is likely to treat that as an incomplete claim or a request for an application.  Such an expression of an intent for benefits would be a placeholder, but it may not constitute a “claim” under the new rules.

The VA Process and VA Forms

VA Claims and Appeals Process
VA Forms

The Need for VA Disability Advocates

The new rules underscore the importance of advocacy with technical expertise in procedure.  As the VA system becomes more complex, the role for highly trained, professional advocates at Veterans Help Group will grow.  The best advice for many veterans is not to try navigating this complexity alone.  That approach will cause delays, errors, and less than optimal benefits.  These rules will also result in extensive court litigation for years to come.

We welcome you to contact our veterans disability lawyers today if you need assistance with a claim. We work with veterans and their families throughout the U.S. and offer a free case evaluation.

More Articles

Federal Court Addresses PTSD Stressors

A recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit confirms that VA must apply a generous standard when evaluating the lay testimony of veterans suffering from PTSD concerning their combat experiences and PTSD stressors. Sanchez-Navarro v....

Permanent and Total VA Disability Ratings for PTSD

What is Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)? Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary, or dangerous event. Symptoms of PTSD usually begin within three months of the...

Depression And Your VA Claim

Depression can negatively affect every aspect of your life: how you feel, think, sleep, function, and interact with others. According to the National Alliance on Mental Health Issues, about 14% of veterans suffer from depression. Depression is one of the most common...

Four Tips On How To Get The Highest PTSD Rating

If you have been fortunate enough to have been granted service connection for PTSD, then you have probably been given a disappointingly low rating.  This is a very common situation so you are not alone. The VA regularly underrates PTSD claims.  In the...

FREE CASE EVALUATION 

  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.