Veterans Court of Appeals Discusses VA Hospital Negligence Standard

i 3 Table Of Contents

Veterans who receive treatment at VA hospitals and suffer from additional disabilities may be entitled to compensation for additional disabilities that result from that care, if the proximate cause of the disability was an event not reasonably foreseeable.

This phrase — which addresses the VA hospital negligence standard — has long caused confusion amongst veterans and their advocates, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has now issued a decision that attempts to provide some clarity.

Schertz v. Shinseki

In Schertz v. Shinseki, No. 11-2694, the veteran underwent an aortic bifemoral bypass graft surgery. An uncommon but possible risk of this surgery is paralysis. The veteran suffered paralysis as a result of the surgery. He filed a claim for VA benefits for the paralysis, arguing that he should be compensated because it was the result of an event not reasonably foreseeable.

The question in this case was the standard that needed to be applied when evaluating whether the event that caused the additional disability was not reasonably foreseeable. Did it matter whether the doctor actually knew that the additional disability could result when he sought informed consent? Or was it what he should have known? Did it matter whether the patient actually knew the additional disability was a possibility when he consented to the surgery?

The Court determined that what the doctor actually knew was not relevant. Rather, the standard in these cases is to look at how a reasonable doctor would have behaved if asked to perform the procedure on a veteran with the same characteristics in a given case. In other words, veterans and their advocates should look at what a reasonable doctor would have done–would he have known that the additional disability was a possibility, and informed the veteran of the risk?

Experienced Advocates for the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

For many issues involving veterans’ treatment and benefits, a veteran can ultimately appeal to the Veterans Court if he or she has not received full compensation. If you need representation look no further: we have advocates who are members of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Bar Association who will use their experience to fight for your rights. There is no cost to you. Any advocate fees and costs that arise will be paid by the government if you win and we will not charge you anything if we are not successful.

Contact us today for help with your appeal.

More Articles

The Importance of Documentation: Gathering Evidence for a PTSD VA Disability Claim

The Importance of Documentation: Gathering Evidence for a PTSD VA Disability Claim Post-traumatic stress disorder is one of the most common reasons veterans receive VA disability benefits. In 2022, 1,343,669 veterans were receiving benefits for service-connected PTSD....

How to Win Your PTSD Claim

How to Win Your PTSD Claim - Donnel Beckles, Managing VA Advocate, Veterans Help Group Donnel Beckles is a top Veterans Advocate, and a member of the National Organization for Veterans Advocates. Donnel is accredited to practice...

PTSD and Veterans: Understanding the 100% Disability Rating Requirements

PTSD and Veterans: Understanding the 100% Disability Rating Requirements Post-traumatic stress disorder is common among veterans, and many veterans receive veterans disability benefits for the condition. However, most are rated less than 100% disabled. The standard...

What Causes PTSD to be Triggered in Veterans?

In the past 15 years, the estimated number of veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD currently numbers more than 500,000. As many as 60,000 of these veterans are Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. Estimates show more than 20% to 30% of veterans...

FREE CASE EVALUATION 

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Hidden
Hidden
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.