CAVC Holds That Veterans Healthy at Entrance Exam Entitled to Presumption of Good Health

In cases where the veteran’s entrance examination does not reveal injury, he is entitled to a presumption that he was in good health at the time of entrance into service. Horn v. Sinseki, CAVC docket no. 10-0853.

This presumption of good health is useful because, if he subsequently develops an injury, it is more difficult for VA to say that the injury was related to something that happened before service, such as a childhood injury. The only way VA can say the injury was related to something that happened before service is to find:

(1) “clear and unmistakable evidence” that the injury happened before service, AND

(2) “clear and unmistakable evidence” that the injury was not aggravated by the veteran’s service.

“Clear and Unmistakable Evidence” that an Injury was Not Aggravated by Service

To find “clear and unmistakable evidence” that the injury was not aggravated by the veteran’s service, VA can either find that the condition stayed the same during service, or it can find that it got worse but only as a result of the natural course of the injury (i.e., was not influenced by anything that happened in service). As you would expect, “clear and unmistakable evidence” is an incredibly high standard – it basically means reasonable minds could not possibly view the evidence differently.

The Court’s recent decision in Horn highlights how hard it is for VA to make a finding that a condition was the result of a childhood injury, where that condition was not recorded on an entrance examination. The Court found that a mere notation on an MEB evaluation that the injury was related to a childhood event is not enough. In other words, the VA would need to come up with more evidence that affirmatively established that the injury was related to a childhood event. And, the evidence must be affirmative – meaning that an absence of records on the injury cannot be used against the veteran.

In these kinds of cases, VA must presume that the veteran’s injury occurred in service, making it a little easier for the veteran to win his service-connection claim. VA often finds “clear and unmistakable evidence” to deny the veteran benefits in cases where the evidence would appear to fall far short of being “clear and unmistakable.”

Did the VA Deny Your Claim?

If the VA is denying your disability claim on these grounds, contact our team today to help you make sense of this complicated issue and to discuss your appeal options. You should be aware that this happens in cases of both physical injury AND mental disability (such as PTSD).

More Articles

What Causes PTSD to be Triggered in Veterans?

In the past 15 years, the estimated number of veterans who have been diagnosed with PTSD currently numbers more than 500,000. As many as 60,000 of these veterans are Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. Estimates show more than 20% to 30% of veterans...

Federal Court Addresses PTSD Stressors

A recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit confirms that VA must apply a generous standard when evaluating the lay testimony of veterans suffering from PTSD concerning their combat experiences and PTSD stressors. Sanchez-Navarro v....

Permanent and Total VA Disability Ratings for PTSD

What is Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)? Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary, or dangerous event. Symptoms of PTSD usually begin within three months of the...

Depression And Your VA Claim

Depression can negatively affect every aspect of your life: how you feel, think, sleep, function, and interact with others. According to the National Alliance on Mental Health Issues, about 14% of veterans suffer from depression. Depression is one of the most common...


  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.